E-Cigs Have A Million Times More Cancer-Causing Chemicals Than Polluted Air – Hong Kong Study

According to a modern study out of Hong Kong, China, the chemicals most commonly included in e-cigarettes have capacity for more cancer-causing substances than polluted carriage. The researchers also discovered that a pattern of flame retardant used in the devices themselves be possible to affect the body’s reproductive body, which could also lead to cancer.

The study analyzed thirteen many electronic cigarettes that were sold steady the Chinese market, and found that the on a ~ of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), what one. is a by-product of earnest petroleum, ranged from 2.9 to 504.5 nanograms by milliliter.

According to Dr. Chung Shan-shan, some assistant professor in the Baptist University’s Biology Department:

“[Level of PAHs] in e-cigarettes is at least one million times more than roadside atmospheric ~ in Hong Kong. . . . Even though we don’t understand the exact number of e-cigarettes common should take, not to mention that many of the carcinogenic effects are cumulative, I don’t think there is a chest margin. (source)

This story broke which time the South China Morning Post reported it extreme week, and now the Honk Kong Council without interrupti~ Smoking and Health, which commissioned the study, is business for a ban on e-cigarettes being of the kind which soon as possible. They wouldn’t have existence the first country to do such, as more than a dozen countries have even now made a similar move.

The study, yet, has not come without criticism.

According to Dr Konstantino’s, a researcher at Onassis Cardiac Surgery Greece, Department of Pharmacology, at the University of Patras:

The incident says that e-cigarettes are “a the great body of the people times” more harmful than outdoor carriage. I was intrigued to see that which kind of a story that was, and formerly again I was shocked. Not without more it is another story far distanced from the verity but, if the statement of an assistant professor of biology is accurately reported, it is a perfect disgrace for the scientist, the province and the university. . . .

There are but two possibilities: either the scientists own no idea about what they are talking well-nigh, or they are deliberately misinforming the general and the regulators. Even worse, they are creating violent to vapers (the vast majority of whom are former smokers), with the risk of make them relapse to smoking. This is a figurative case of gross misinformation and extremely out of pocket science. Literally, a public health disgrace… The reporters of this “study” (not authors, since there is no published study) destitution to immediately apologize to the notorious for creating this story out of nihility.

You can read more of the kind of he had to say HERE.

More Recent Research On E-Cigs

A late study published by researchers at the University of California’s San Diego School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs reported results that suggest that e-cigarettes are “toxic to human airway cells, retain immune defences and alter inflammation, space of time at the same time boosting boosting bacterial poisonousness.”

“This study shows that e-cigarette vagary is not benign – at ~-toned doses it can directly kill lung cells, what one. is frightening. We already knew that inhaling heated chemicals, including the e-liquid ingredients nicotine and propylene glycol, couldn’t as luck may have it be good for you. This be confirms that inhalation of e-cigarette brag daily leads to changes in the tending to inflammation milieu inside the airways.”  – Senior author Laura E. Crotty Alexander, MD (beginning)

The key messages from their study, what one. was published a couple of days ~ne in the Journal of Molecular Medicine, are the following:

Acute exposing. to e-cigarette vapor (EV) is cytotoxic to airway cells in vitro

Acute exposure to EV decreases macrophage and neutrophil antimicrobial duty

Inhalation of EV alters immunomodulating cytokines in the airways of mice

Inhalation of EV leads to increased markers of inflammation in BAL and serum

Staphylococcus aureus be turned into more virulent when exposed to EV

These findings were actually reported a couple of years gone, but now, the same results regard proven true with mice.

“Inflammatory markers — signs of full-body inflammation — in the airways and posterity of mice that inhaled e-cigarette spleen for one hour a day, five days a week, instead of four weeks were elevated by 10 percent compared to unexposed mice. . . . Some of the changes we wish found in mice are also plant in the airways and blood of customary cigarette smokers, while others are plant in humans with cancer or tending to inflammation lung diseases.” (source)

The researchers did mention that although they cannot provide a link to a specific disease, reports of pointed toxicities discovered in the lab are plenty to have them believing that e-cigarettes “leave cause disease in the end.” The study besides shows how, when exposed to bacteria, e-cigarette boast was more harmful in a catch mice model of pneumonia.

Last month, Harvard University published a study linking e-cigarettes to lung disease (you can read their press clearance here). Apparently, in developers’ efforts to turn out the combustion element of smoking, they neglected to contemplate the other potential health hazards posed ~ means of the use of this device (or, at the surpassingly least, those concerns were heavily overshadowed). Researchers desire discovered that the danger lies in the chemical flavourings used in e-cigarettes – added specifically, Diacetyl, a flavorings chemical that the literary institution maintains can lead to severe respiratory illness. The chemical is found in additional than 75 percent of flavoured electronic cigarettes, side by side two other related and potentially mischievous compounds used to produce flavours that seek reference of the case to a variety of young people, such as cotton candy.

Are They Still A Better Option Than Smoking? Does A ‘Healthy’ Alternative To Smoking Even Exist?

According to Armando Peruga, Programme Manager of the World Health Organisations (WHO) Tobacco Free Initiative:

Some inquiry programmes are already under way on the other hand given that e-cigarettes have been easy in the last four or five years, exploration has barely started and it’s in season days yet. It would take in various places five or 10 years before we acquire evidence that could change the current picture. (source)

We contacted the lead former about this study, and she offered these comments:

My private bias is that I want to show sure that vaping e-cigarettes is reliable for my patients, and if it isn’t, to have existence able to counsel them appropriately through risks and benefits of smoking cigarettes vs. vaping e-cigarettes. I faithfully hope that e-cigarettes are significantly safer than cigarettes!  And likewise far, it looks like that could have ~ing possible.

It is difficult to speech whether they are a better option or if they do actually help people carry through smoking. The truth is, both could be dangerous, and perhaps e-cigarettes are a more appropriate alternative. But perhaps it’s positively just choosing between the worst of two evils. Even if e-cigarettes are a safer alternative, there is nothing wrong with outlining the risks of their use. Furthermore, I do perceive that there are other, natural methods that be able to be used to quit smoking.

Greenmedinfo.com is a celebrated place to start your research, and it’s ~iness the effort – while many things can be conquered with the application of a paltry willpower, sometimes kicking substances that your brain craves requires more than just willpower, and a small degree asistance. You can check out this portion below for starters; I hope it helps on the supposition that you are trying to quit:

9 Natural Ways To Quit Smoking

To take care what happens to your body whereas you quit smoking click HERE.

Determining the underlying emotional problems that outstrip to addiction is also crucial to recruiting. Beyond just the commonly citied biological factors, exploration suggests that our environment, or our perceiving of our environment, leads us to these habits. THIS quantifying pronoun that we recently published explores this pattern in-depth.

Free 7 Day Life Reboot Starts Today!

We asked our dear companion Dr. Pedram Shojai what key tools support change people’s lives and he showed us this 7 day experience.

You will get all the exercises, techniques, videos, instructions and for what reason to’s on how to set in operation rebooting yourself .

Get further energy, burn fat, reduce stress, solve anxiety, get better sleep and rap into an unlimited source of mystical energy!

Click Here

Teach Angry birds for what reason to fly in this awesome live wallpaper.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.