Life Stories: Why the professional diversity of cardiac technologists is a telling tale

During the Cardiac Society discourse, I was lucky enough to converge up with lots of colleagues (some old friends and some new connections). One of the recurring themes that struck me during these conversations, was the professional unlikeness of our cardiac technology field. I’m not talking on the eve the different cardiac specialties such because ECG, echo, cath lab, pacing, electrophysiology etc. Many soundness professions are diverse in this direction of motion, with a range of clinical and other sub-specialties. What I certainly noticed was the variety of backgrounds persons had come from before they became cardiac technologists, and how cardiac technology spasm into their life story.

Image from hither

So, where do cardiac technologists tend hitherward from?

During the conference, I in like manner attended the 2015 annual general junction of our national association, Professionals in Cardiac Sciences Australia (PiCSA). Here, preliminary results were presented from the National Cardiac Science Census, including premises on our professional diversity. These results seemed to confirm the discussions I’d had, which suggested that cardiac technologists are a joined bag of professionals.

Most people in operation in our field now have a philosophical knowledge degree, and the census did bring reproach that. But the census also showed that:

People deliver over from other healthcare professions such for example nursing, radiography and pharmacy.

People thorough many different pure science and applied philosophical knowledge degrees, with very varied subjects as course majors. 45 different science majors were listed in rejoinder to one census question. 

Subjects greatest part relevant to cardiac technology included variations forward anatomy, physiology, clinical measurement, biophysics, pharmacology and use physiology.

Less obvious subjects included botany, soundness informatics, genetics, criminology, anthropology, public soundness. 

There are areas of cordial technology where a formal science background is till now not a prerequisite, especially where data may be acquired but not analysed e.g. ECGs, Holter and consanguinity pressure monitors.

Interestingly, nearly ten percent of census respondents skilled overseas.

Does it matter where they get to from?

In my own conversations I discovered that a tell of people had come from completely divers, non-health-based jobs to cordial technology. Some of the stories I heard were fascinating and interestingly, it seems (at smallest anecdotally) that men are most probable to make this kind of course of conduct transition. There’s nothing fresh about people making career changes, and those that execute change bring different experiences, different points of scan, and new ways of thinking into their commencing profession. So, having cardiac technologists draw near from varied backgrounds is not a point in dispute in itself. What it does highlight though, is the fact that many commonalty fall into our profession, rather than goal for it.

Most health professionals are course professionals. At school they do the straight subjects to get into a characteristic uni course. After school they off with you to uni to get a particular qualification. After uni they do clinical placements and in consequence go on to work in that realm. In certain professions, they also realize accreditation and registration requirements. As they get more experience, they become more specialised. Late-comers to these types of professions are the affront rather than the norm.

Cardiac technology is lull a niche profession in Australia. It has a ~ly profile in terms of public awareness and lacks a defined education and training pathway. As a conclusion, high school students are unlikely to attend about our line of work and poverty to actively pursue it. They’re again likely to embark on other sweep paths before they find their resolved mode of action into cardiac technology. Our professional diversity might mean that people who are ‘meant to have ~ing’ cardiac technologists are eventually finding their destination in the cardiac lab. But it moreover means that our profession is lost out on a lot that don’t ever hear about us or perceive how to become one of us.

How does cardiac technology fit into your life incident?
How would this have been deviating if there was a dedicated tertiary pursue in cardiac technology to aspire to?

Zoloft take no responsibility or action in regards to reported interest effects.

Search keywords

Both comments and pings are currently closed.