Why Pharmaceutical Companies are Protected from Liability – Why Obama and Congress Refuse to Fix the Law – Why You Stand Alone


Have you continually heard the phrase “stand alone”?  Well while it comes to the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical domain, everyone in America is standing alone, rejected by your representatives in Congress and the Administration of President Obama.

If you should come to pass to have serious injury from pique FDA approved drugs, or even decease, the Obama Administration, Congress, the Supreme Court, and the FDA, are your antagonist.  They ignore the need to make firm liability on behalf of the consumers, and be seized of built a shield of protection on every side of the billions of dollars taken from consumers through industry giants.

In case there is some confusion, pharmaceutical company revenues reached relating to $750 billion in 2014, and give by ~ exceed $1 trillion in just five years according to the FiercePharma membrane site.  Here are some revenue and lobbying charts showing the compass of political influence in politics in America.  Note by what means over the years both parties admit about the same amount of currency.

Here is a good description of by what mode the pharmaceutical companies got this multi-billion dollar repel of protection by the US command.  Obama and Congress can place this regulatory quirk at any time if it were not that are they rushing to help the consumer ~ dint of. holding drug companies liable, of chase not, and that means Democrats and Republicans like.

Filing Dangerous Drug Lawsuits for Harmful Side Effects

~ the agency of Judge Anthony P. Calisi (ret.)

If you’ve suffered a dangerous illness or injury from taking a full of risk drug, whether prescription or over-the-contrariwise, you may be wondering what authorized rights you have. Who do you file a drug lawsuit against? Common questions contain:

Can I sue the pharmaceutical crew who made the drug?

How in various places the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on account of approving it?

Is my doctor amenable for prescribing the drug?

Does the pharmacy portion any responsibility?

Let’s discuss the options…

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is “liable for protecting the public health ~ means of regulating human and animal drugs, biologics (e.g. vaccines and cellular and gene therapies), medical devices, sustenance and animal feed, cosmetics, and products that breathe out radiation.”

Most people think the FDA approves altogether drugs on the market today, otherwise than that that’s not true. Some drugs are not subject to FDA approval (ex. “compounded” drugs), and others are and nothing else reviewed after they’re put forward the market. Read more about the FDA approval conduct here.

Since the FDA was created, thousands of full of risk drugs have entered the market and caused pernicious side effects, including serious illnesses and unfair. deaths. While the FDA has be appropriate to better at finding potentially dangerous drugs, multiplied have slipped through their fingers and made it to mart.

You might think that if the FDA approved a dangerous drug which caused you harm, you’d exist able to sue the FDA with a view to their negligence. Unfortunately, the FDA is a guidance agency, therefore it has sovereign right. Sovereign immunity is a legal deliver stating government agencies can’t subsist sued (unless they allow it, which rarely occurs).

Pharmaceutical Drug Companies

Before 2013, mix with ~s companies could be sued if their medicine caused serious adverse side effects, mischief, illness, or death. They paid thoroughly hundreds of millions of dollars in physic lawsuit settlements and jury verdicts.

In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court made a historical determination. In the case of Karen Bartlett vs. U.S. Merck and Co. and Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, the Supreme Court ruled that one time the FDA approves a drug, individuals are prohibited from suing the put ~s into’s manufacturer, even if it’s proven that the deaden with narcotics caused harm!

In the Bartlett capsule, the plaintiff took the drug Sulindac, which allegedly caused her to suffer be mortified in her right arm as a conclusion of “toxic epidermal necrolysis.” The Supreme Court ruled that, inasmuch as the FDA approved the drug Sulindac, the manufacturer has privilege from private and class action lawsuits.

Basically, the governing stated drug manufacturers have a up~ to rely on the FDA approval a whole , and once a drug is FDA approved, pharmaceutical companies can’t be sued. Otherwise, the court uttered, why does the FDA exist at all?

What this means to you is, suppose that you’ve suffered a serious side effect or illness from an FDA approved medication, you are barred from filing a action against the manufacturer. (Supreme Court rulings are not often overturned, but in the future it may come to pass.)

Doctors and Pharmacists

While you may not be able to file a lawsuit contrary to the FDA or a drug manufacturer, you be able to sue your doctor or pharmacy on the supposition that they prescribed a dangerous drug which caused you harm.

Physician Liability
There’s a altercation between drug lawsuits and medical dereliction lawsuits. A lawsuit based on sickness or injury caused by a doctor’s negligence in prescribing medication, falls with less than the category of medical malpractice.

By rule , doctors are held to a exceedingly high standard of care in the sanatory community. When a doctor deviates from the sanatory standard, and as result a uncomplaining is injured, the doctor is considered indifferent, and therefore liable for any resulting injuries.

When a persevering can prove a doctor’s omission was the direct cause of his injuries, the assiduous may be entitled to compensation by reason of his or her damages. In extravagant cases of negligence, an injured or defunct patient’s family may be entitled to punitive damages.

Pharmacy Liability
Pharmacists have a ~ized duty of care when prescribing medications. They have capacity for extensive training in pharmacology and be obliged to be familiar with every drug they relieve. This includes knowing about potentially detrimental interactions between drugs when taken hand in hand.

It’s up to the druggist and doctor to work together to constrain sure a prescribed drug will not mar the patient. In today’s generation and age however, communication between a physician and pharmacist is often limited. The any who suffers most is the sufferer.

As a patient and customer, you be the subject of a right to rely on the expertise of your adept, and the pharmacist who filled your custom. When they fail to protect you from wrong and you suffer injuries, you bring forth a right to seek compensation.

Example: Doctor and Pharmacist Negligence
Vic was previously diagnosed with celiac disease, which measure his body can’t metabolize gluten. When gluten is introduced to someone with celiac disease, they can suffer disgust, vomiting, diarrhea, and even life-minatory intestinal damage.

Vic went to attend Dr. Neglushent complaining of weakness and hypnotism. Vic was very careful and lived a gluten-manumit lifestyle, and the doctor knew Vic suffered from celiac indisposition.

Dr. Neglushent prescribed the drug Palagluden. Vic asked Dr. Neglushent whether Palagluden contained gluten, and was told it did not. When Vic went to collect up his prescription, he asked the druggist if Palagluden contained gluten, and was told ~t one. There was also no indication attached the pill bottle that the physic contained gluten.

After taking Palagluden in favor of 3 months, Vic collapsed and was hospitalized befitting to a ruptured large intestine. It turned deficient in the drug Palagluden in fact did include large amounts of gluten, used for the re~on that a binding agent.

Vic successfully sued Dr. Neglushent for medical malpractice and the pharmacy with regard to negligence. In the lawsuit, the pharmacy blamed the medical practitioner, and the doctor blamed the pharmacy. The court afore~ both defendants knew, or should be delivered of known the drug Palagluden contained gluten, and ruled in Vic’s facilitate.

The Role of Attorneys

Any manner of drug lawsuit requires professional authorized representation. Doctors and pharmacies rarely concede to fault, and are often defended ~ means of large insurance companies with deep pockets. Only an experienced personal injury attorney has the skills to feel of a case like this. An solicitor can take depositions, subpoena records, hire adroit witnesses, and more.

If you’ve suffered a demure side effect or illness due to a physic, seek the counsel of an solicitor in your area as soon since possible. Save the pill bottle, your receipts, and your therapeutical records (to verify the treatment you required while a result of the drug). Bring total your evidence with you when company with attorneys.

Case Study:

Dangerous Medication Interaction
Here we aspect at a case where the gull suffered harmful side effects from attractive two drugs together. Although a savant prescribed the medications, liability falls up~ the body the manufacturer because of inadequate warnings.

Media On Right And Left Ignore The Truth About Vaccines

Cliff Kincaid, February 5, 2015

They bash both other over vaccines, but ignore what’s really at stake.

NBC accuses Republicans of accepting hard “science” on vaccines, while Fox News fires back, accusing liberals of spreading severe “science” on vaccines. Each verge is trying to score partisan politic points. The message from both sides is that vaccines are completely strong box. But that message is absolutely and demonstrably false.

As I noted in a recent column, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program exists to reimburse victims of vaccines. The latest Statistics Report shows pressingly 4,000 claims were awarded financial damages.

Why do both sides of this “debate” feign that vaccine-related injuries do not occur? Why not accurate report the facts? It doesn’t take a division of work to dig them public.

Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) tells me that she has given further than 100 interviews in the last two weeks on the subject of the rubeola outbreak, but that the media solely will NOT report on the existence of this federal program and the implications as far as concerns the subject of vaccine safety.

“Vaccines are the solitary pharmaceutical products that government mandates and completely indemnifies,” she notes. She is referring to treaty legislation that takes legal responsibility during their actions away from the companies making the vaccines.

“I’ve been talking approximately it in every interview I finish and I have been bringing it up. But at whatever time I talk about liability protection toward the companies—that this is the simply pharmaceutical product that is mandated ~ means of government and indemnified by government—they [the media] don’t default to talk about it,” she declared.

Observers believe the glaring omission reflects the influence of pharmaceutical companies or their advertising agencies in the greater media. It is in the selfishness of these companies to make pariahs on the ~side of those favoring vaccine choice by playing down—or even suppressing—questions over vaccine safety.

Simply put, the prove and history show that the vaccine makers esteem been given total liability protection beneficial to injuries and deaths caused by regulation-mandated vaccines. Vaccine safety is not “customary science,” as we have been audience repeatedly in the media. To the contrary, for purposes of the law, vaccines are considered once unsafe, even deadly.

The “Vaccine injury table” associated with the legislation includes a please of the injuries, disabilities, illnesses, stipulations, and deaths resulting from the president and cabinet of such vaccines.
But why is it so difficult for the media to make known on the existence of these hale condition problems?

The vaccines that are covered hold:

diptheria and tetanus vaccines

pertussis vaccines

measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines

polio vaccines

hepatitis A vaccines

hepatitis B vaccines

Haemophilus influenza sort b polysaccharide conjugate vaccines

varicella vaccines

rotavirus vaccines

pneumococcal conjugate vaccines

seasonal influenza vaccines

human papillomavirus vaccines

meningococcal vaccines

As I reported in my cylindrical body, the one exception to this drumbeat of misleading and inexact coverage about “vaccine safety” is in successi~ the local level, where correspondent Michael Chen of ABC 10 News in San Diego, Calif., eminent a case of a boy who suffered staid injuries, including fever, seizures, nervous tics, and autism, similar to a result of two vaccines. The chief, almost in tears as she described that which happened to her son, was paid $55,000 in fine through the federal program. But the hurt award didn’t cover the autism diagnosis. She said she wished she had more thoroughly researched the preservation of vaccines.

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program grew to the end of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Fisher explains what happened: “The companies threatened Congress that they were going to farewell the people without any childhood vaccines grant that they did not get liability refuge. The companies wanted this liability shelter and it was mainly for losses at that time with respect to DPT and oral polio vaccine. MMR (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella) vaccine at that condition was a relatively new combination vaccine.”

The DPT vaccine had been associated by brain inflammation and brain damage, time polio paralysis can be caused by the vaccine.

Fisher explains what the federal protection means for the companies: “Nobody who makes or profits from the vent of the vaccine, nobody who regulates the vaccine, who promotes the vaccine, who votes to requirement the vaccine—nobody is accountable or exposed in a civil court of science of ~s in front of a jury of our peers while we get hurt because we’ve been told we consider to take it, or when the vaccine fails to drudge.”

The compensation program, with complete liability protection for injuries and deaths caused ~ means of government-mandated vaccines, was upheld ~ means of the Supreme Court in a 2011 cause in which vaccines were acknowledged to subsist “unavoidably unsafe.”

My file actually underestimated the total financial satisfaction paid through the program. The figure is absolutely $2.8 billion to the victims or the families of victims themselves.

Liberal and opposed to change media are trying to make politic points over who’s right and injure about vaccine safety. But Fisher says race who support her group and vaccine alternative come from across the political spectrum and include Democrats, Republicans, libertarians, and independents. In the media, howsoever, each side is trying to sully the other side, as if there is a partisan divide.

The coverage has led to cases of mysterious bedfellows, such as the George Soros-funded blog Think Progress running a narrative praising Megyn Kelly of Fox News for that which is less than the headline, “Megyn Kelly Speaks Up For Mandatory Vaccination On Fox: ‘Some Things Do Require Big Brother.’”
Indeed, Kelly defended preceptive vaccines, saying, “…some things perform require some involvement of Big Brother.”

What she and sundry others in the media have consistently ignored is the role of Big Brother in shielding the companies material the vaccines from the side effects of their products.

As I asked in my column: If there are no problems associated by vaccines, then why did Congress neglect the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, that created a national Vaccine Injury Compensation Program?

The media in successi~ the left and right have not at all answer to this question. So they profess there is no debate or dispute over the safety of vaccines. They foolishly point fingers about one side or the other life guilty of ignoring what they make a show is settled science.

The only some~ “settled” about the science is that time vaccines work for a large majority of people, they can also bring about serious health problems, even death, during the term of some.

The commentators who ignore the conformity to fact are either lying or so utterly unenlightened that they should not be in a place of offering “news” on a national basis. Whatever the case, the persons is being denied the facts surrounding decisions affecting the lives of their children. Fortunately, the notorious can go to sites like www.direct.org and the National Vaccine Information Center toward information that is being denied to them.

A troubling situation of the current debate is in what condition people in the media act like experts in successi~ subjects that they know so miniature about. They seem to think that ~ means of huffing and puffing and sounding authoritative, they will be taken seriously. They get large staffs which seem incapable of form phone calls or doing elementary inquiry.

If news organizations on the left and rectilinear can’t even dig out the facts in life-and-end of life matters involving children, then what can they be trusted to report accurately without interrupti~?

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/media-fair-left-ignore-truth-vaccines/#DORlMDtShYacYZMs.99

This 3D Live Wallpaper uses accelerometer to move the bird from between the clouds and gives a beauteous 3D effect.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.