The Serotonin Levels-Depression Link Is a ‘Marketing Myth,’ Psychiatrist Claims

​The usual belief that depression is tied to serotonin levels in the brain is a fiction, argues British psychiatrist David Healy in a controversial ed​itorial published Wednesday in the of the healing art journal BMJ.

Healy, who is a professor of psychiatry at the Hergest psychiatric one in North Wales, argues that spare levels of serotonin have nothing to achieve with depression. He suggested that because the 1980s, people have been amiss. prescribed SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) drugs of the like kind as Prozac because of Big Pharma’s “marketing of a fiction.” But SSRIs are widely considered full of help to treat depression, and are in addition thought to be safer than older “tricyclic” drugs.

Healy wrote that the SSRI group of drugs came into vogue in the sometime 1980s, despite being mooted earlier in the 1960s. The resurgence in their popularity, he said, was due to sedition concerns about dependence on tranquilizers—drugs in the same state as Valium and Xanax—in the in good season 1980s.

I reached out to the Royal College of Psychiatrists, and be it so no one was available for make ~s, they sent me over a specification, which had been prepared as a rejoinder to Healy’s editorial. In the announcement, Professor Sr Simon Wessely, President of the Royal College of Psychiatrists afore~: “That antidepressants are helpful in dolefulness, together with psychological treatments, is established. How they carry into practice this is not—most researchers accept long since moved on from the going to decay serotonin model. Most important of all, the newer drugs—the SSRIs, are safer allowing that taken in overdose than the older tricyclics.”

Serotonin is involved in practically every aspect of the human dead ~. It can be found in the embowel, the bloodstream, the bones, and the muscles. Healy argues that similar to it’s one of the ut~ primitive neurot​ransmitters, once interfered through , people risked other things going abuse in their bodies. “These drugs act in c~tinuance your muscles and on your bones, in this way that increases the risk of muscle problems or knock,” he told me.

Healy said that SSRIs’ use in alleviating indentation was initially based on a concatenation of assumptions. “Because people meditation these drugs (SSRIs) act on a not many different systems, including the serotonin body, they thought that something was treat unjustly with the serotonin system of lower classes who were depressed,” he before-mentioned.

“The marketing departments of companies dire to sell these drugs came up through the idea that what the drugs (SSRIs) cozen is correct lowered serotonin,” Healy told me. “The was the mind of idea that worked tremendously well by a lot of doctors, and patients. It seemed to covenant a reason to give the pill ~-end it was completely wrong. It was simply a marketing idea.”

In 2005, a stu​dy published ~ the agency of Jeffrey R Lacasse and Jonathan Leo explored the be wanting of evidence suggesting that serotonin levels were linked to sadness. The researchers argued that while SSRI advertising has “expanded the antidepressant place of traffic,” there is little scientific manifest to prove the link between serotonin and dulness. In another stu​dy conducted in 2014 through researchers at the Wayne State University School of Medicine, it was construct that “mice lacking the competency to​ make serotonin in their intellectual faculties did not show depression-like symptoms.”

While according to Healy, the pharmaceutical sedulousness has churned out this myth to bring about profits, he said that most at mistake were the doctors and psychiatrists who had been prescribing the SSRIs to patients inasmuch as the 1980s.

“Doctors get qualified in physiology and pharmacology, but the any thing they should be trained all over is in how companies market to them,” said Healy. “In order for you to prevail upon the drugs, you only need to avaunt to the doctor, so companies barely need to market to doctors. People like me, doctors, haven’t asked the pharmaceutical companies tough questions.”

While Healy asserted that SSRIs confer not work on severely depressed nation, John H. Krystal MD, a professor in Psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, told me throughout email that “the response to SSRI antidepressants appears to be different for every individual, as opposed to being non-effective for wholly.” Krystal also said that the role of serotonin steady the cause of depression still was unclear, and supported the survey put forward by Wessely that psychiatry had abandoned the “low serotonin” hypotheses as the cause for depression long gone.

In a study conducted in 2011, Krystal reanalysed premises from​ seven clinical trials involving 2,515 patients treated with SRI antidepressants or placebo. He told me that “the majority of patients (over 75 percent) showed a more excellent response to patients treated with placebo. However, closely one quarter of patients treated by SRIs showed a poorer response than patients treated through placebo.” This finding, said Krystal, raised the “determining issue of whether there are ways to confound those patients who would seem to have ~ing better off avoiding SRIs and to call off these individuals to other treatments in spite of their depression.”

Over the phone, Healy stressed that the main conduit danger lay in Big Pharma overhyping SSRIs during the time that having more benefits than side furniture, and for doctors and psychiatrists not to question this. Similar critiques of Big Pharma were moreover voiced in 2013 by psychotherapist James Davies, who argued in successi~ Channel 4’s Fac​t Check notice that “the so-called advantages of these medicines be obliged been oversold and overplayed by the pharmaceutical results and by members of the medical profession who have been recruited by the industry to sell up the advantages to other doctors and to their patients.”

Exactly in what way SSRIs work is still unknown. However, up~ concluding his statement, Wessely advised that rabble should not change their current medication.

I am a Type II Diabetic through urine showing high creatinine and protein.

Search keywords

Both comments and pings are currently closed.